Big I, little t Blog

Big I, little t Blog
About The Blog
Contact Us
Guest Blogger Guide
Events
AIIM/On Demand Blog
AIIM/On Demand Videos
Xerox at AIIM/On Demand
On Demand Website
EIP
Xerox Partner Summit 2007
Search this blog

Podcasts
Videos
IT Xchange Webcast Series
Xerox Thought Leadership Program

Recent Posts
Archives

    Full Archive

Categories
Feeds

Blogroll
Xerox Exchange
doingitbetter
Techdirt
IT Conversations
Rough Type
The Enterprise Content Management Blog
Content Log
Slashdot.org
InfoWorld’s “SMB IT”
InfoWorld’s “IT Troubleshooter”
ZDNet’s IT Facts
ZDNet’s Government IT
ZDNet’s Education IT
Document Imaging Talk
Computerworld
The Daily Blog
The Tech Beat
Tech Linkletter CIO
Koch’s IT Strategy
Inside eWeek News
Advice Line (IT Blog on InfoWorld)
IT Garage
IT Borderlands
Real World IT
PrintCEO Blog
Get Bizucated
Free Color Printers
ShopFloor.org
 
Trade Publication Links
Baseline
CIO
CIO Decisions
CIO Insight
CIOUpdate.com
CMS Watch
CNET/ZDNET
Computerworld
CRN
Digital Publishing Solutions
e-Content
eDoc Magazine
eWeek
Federal Computer Week
Government Computer News
Government Technology
Healthcare IT News
Health Management Technology
Healthcare Informatics
Health Data Management
IDG News Service
InformationWeek
InfoWorld
Intelligent Enterprise
KMWorld
Network Computing
Network World
Office Solutions
Office World News
PC Magazine
PC World
VARBusiness
Washington Technology
WhatTheyThink.com
ABA Banking Journal
Bank Technology News
U.S. Banker
Wall Street & Technology
National Underwriter
Insurance & Technology
Tech Decisions for Insurance
Campus Technology
District Administration
eSchool News
T.H.E. Journal
 
Industry Analyst Firm Links
Baseline
AMR Research
BERTL
Better Buys for Business
Bissett Communications Corp.
Blackstone Research Associates
BPIF
Buyers Laboratory Inc.
Cambashi
Caslon & Co.
CharisCo Printer Labs
consultROY.com
Current Analysis
DA Digital
DigitalPrintInfo
DocuTrends
epMI
EquaTerra
Financial Insights
Footprint Communications
Forrester Research
Gartner Inc.
Gilbane Group, Inc.
Roger P. Gimbel & Associates
IDC
Industry Analysts, Inc.
InfoTrends, Inc.
Intellective Solutions
INTERQUEST
J Zarwan Partners
John M Hamm & Associates
Lyra Research, Inc.
Madison Advisors
NAPL
Naselli & Associates
Nima Hunter Inc
Pro Buyers LLC
RIT
Schnoll Media Consulting
Spencer & Associates
State Street Consultants, Inc.
TowerGroup
Winterberry Group LLC
XEXCO/Strategy Analytics Ltd
 
Blog Home   |    Recent Posts   |    Archive   |    Feeds   |    Podcasts   |    Events   |    Search   |    Blogroll


« May 2007 | Main | July 2007 »

June 19, 2007

Keep Your Eye on the Ball - “Trade Secrets”

Ellen Messmer's Computerworld article inspired me to reiterate that one of the first things companies must do to protect themselves and their future is to capture critical information at the point of origin, when it is first conceived. If there is not a system or process in place to manage sensitive information such as trade secrets, they will probably be up for grabs. Many well intended organizations fumble the ball at this critical stage and competitive information that drives profitability walks out the door and is lost forever.

Lifecycle management of the most critical organizational assets is a daunting task, but technologies are emerging to automate and semi-automate key process steps to accomplish effective management for security. They include: inventory, categorization, identification, classification, and valuation. The application of security controls is dependent on where the asset is in its lifecycle. The value may not be fully known at the time of creation so it would be advisable to apply the highest classification level at that time. Additional trade secret projects, products, and strategies are likely to emerge throughout the development phase, depending on the type of trade secret. This framework offers a better means to review and evaluate trade secrets to make decisions, which may include seeking protection under patent law. As trade secret ideas and innovations evolve toward production, they will likely be subjected to a wider distribution resulting in greater exposure and risk to confidentiality. Trade secrets may require evaluation for licensing and other profitability considerations. At some point in time, a trade secret may become obsolete.

Organizations can’t afford to merely react to what’s occurring around them. They must adopt a proactive information security management approach that will secure information assets from a broad spectrum of internal and external threats. This must be led by a dedicated champion such as a CIO or VP of technology who has the authority to obtain acceptance and commitment from communities of interest across the enterprise at all levels. Much interaction and cooperation is required to transform a framework into a blueprint that will be used to implement the security program.

We cannot stop the curve ball from coming our way, but we can stay in the game by keeping our eye on the ball.

David Drab
Principal, Information Content Security Services
Xerox Global Services

June 18, 2007

Coloring Outside the Lines

I’ve always wondered what happens outside my HR walls. I know what we do, but what do we really do again? We provide machines and service awesomeness but I guess I’m one of those people that like to experience things first hand.

And then. I saw it.
The IGEN. Ryan (one of our manufacturing engineers) from my Lean Six Sigma greenbelt training class offered to take some of us on a plant tour a couple months back. He made good on his offer and I took Becky (she maintains this site) with me.

[We did put on protective eyewear like we were supposed to and we all laughed awkwardly because we knew how ridiculous we looked…so I digress.]

The IGEN is pretty impressive in that the colors are amazing. They’re as bright as my highlighters, as sharp as the HD TV at Best Buy (I can see the pores on some of the models in the posters), and as clean as the white glove test (all the “dots” are in the right place, and there were nothing “outside the lines”).

[I was one of those kids in school that colored in the lines. That point was important to me.]

I was also impressed by the fact that the people who work on the IGEN, chose to work on the IGEN. After voicing their desire to work on the machines, employees were then tested to qualify. So to me, the desire + skill = medium rare Kobe beef?

It’s like going to a good steak restaurant. The chef may have the love for cooking but didn’t source the right cut from the right vendor because of his lack of discernment; or the chef has no love for the tender cut of meat and either overcooks it or undercook it. (Ah! The agony!) I like mines from an accredited vendor cooked medium rare please.

Wouldn’t it be nice too to have immaculate prints in its entire pore revealing glory?

I’m going to check out Shutterfly now for some photo thank you cards…

Mazie Ng
Human Resources
Xerox

June 12, 2007

The Limits of Efficiency, the Promise of Responsiveness

All businesses exist on a continuum between efficiency and responsiveness and in the high change and unpredictable world we live in, responsiveness trumps efficiency. Business strategies that emphasize efficiency and economies of scale no longer yield the profits we seek because they are so vulnerable to unexpected or sudden changes. The very act of optimizing operations and cost structures for efficiency robs companies of the flexibility and resources they need to respond effectively to change and new opportunities.

Because of their lack of responsiveness, companies optimized for efficiency find their only option for dealing with unexpected changes is to shed employees, cut costs and downsize. Their repeated bouts of downsizing and then rehiring remind me of the attempts people make when they go on binge diets. They get some immediate short term results but over the longer run their condition just gets worse.

Many brand name companies (such as Motorola, Kodak, Ford and GM) are showing us their focus on efficiency is not shielding them from market fluctuations; their business models no longer work. Their strategies for efficiency are based on 20th Century industrial concepts like spreading fixed costs across huge numbers of units sold, long production runs, and the assumption that there is a steady, predictable demand for their products.

In reality, these things are conspicuously absent from our global economy. Companies that succeed these days are the ones able to make continuous small adjustments in their operations and product offerings as events unfold. Business success means to be “efficient enough” and concentrate instead on being highly responsive to markets and individual customers.

Toyota makes money making cars where Ford and GM do not. They prefer to use smaller more flexible machines that can be quickly reconfigured to do a range of different tasks instead of using big and complex machines that attempt to maximize efficiency in performing a single task but cannot be easily reconfigured to perform new tasks. Toyota focuses first on responsiveness.

The Internet itself is optimized for responsiveness, not efficiency. It was built to operate in a high change world. It is full of redundancy and multiple pathways from one point to another. It is composed of interconnected networks of autonomous operating units that can each sense their environment moment to moment and then respond quickly as situations change. This is what makes it so stable and scalable.

We talk a lot about innovation so it’s important to see the connection between innovation and responsiveness. Innovation usually doesn’t mean creating something wildly new and different; it mostly means continuous incremental improvement to existing products and services to better fit changing conditions.

In the business IT ecosystem of networked PCs, servers, printers and handheld devices there are a hundred opportunities every day to make constant small adjustments to help customers respond to surges in demand for existing services and emerging demand for new services. If you are a supplier of these products, what responsive new offerings have you rolled out lately? If you are a user of these products, what do you use this stuff for and what would make your life easier?

It’s important to note that all innovation, all responsiveness is information based. What is innovative and responsive to one customer in one circumstance is not so to another customer in a different circumstance. You need constant and current information about your customers and your products to know the difference. Success lies in putting this information to work to create a continuous stream of improvements and enhancements based on existing products to fit the constantly changing needs of specific customers not just a mass market.

The customer is the ultimate asset these days, not your plant or your equipment or products. The opportunity now is to apply what you know about your customers and what you know about your products to create a tailored bundle of products and value-added services that constantly evolves to best fit your customers’ needs. You combine your knowledge of your customers and of your products to become, in effect, your customers’ purchasing agent. You’re someone constantly seeking the best mix of products and services to fit customers’ changing situations, not a clever gadfly trying to sell them something they don’t need because if your customers don’t grow and prosper, you won’t either.

Responsiveness means you co-evolve products with your customers. Involve them in the process of designing new products. For instance, Xerox engineers thought commercial printers wanted printing machines with a second print engine to handle specialty jobs and inks – an idea based on industrial concepts of specialization and efficiency. Instead, they discovered what they really wanted was a machine with a second printing engine for backup to keep production going even at a lower rate until the big engine could be fixed – an idea based on responsiveness through backup and redundancy.

Think of your customers as your capital and think of responsiveness as the way to earn interest on that capital. The bigger the base of customers, the more the opportunities there are to be responsive to their changing needs. Opportunities these days quickly evolve into other opportunities; one opportunity usually leads to another; learn to ride the waves of change. Develop a reputation for responsiveness; your customers will seek you out for this very reason.

Michael Hugos
CIO at Large
Center for Systems Innovation

June 11, 2007

Securing the Enterprise—A New Podcast

As I mentioned in my last post, we recorded the latest Security Summit a few weeks ago at the NYSE and as a result we have two new podcasts up today. The first covers the lively discussion of internal and external threats with our distinguished panelist: Dan Verton, a renowned writer on cyber crime, terrorism, and insider threats; R. Mark Halligan, Esq., lead attorney for Lovells on international trade secret matters; and John Nolan, director of the Phoenix Consulting Group and former U.S. intelligence officer. There can be no doubt that information security is one of the top issues facing global enterprises today, but senior executive still have not put on their strategic hats to support holistic implementations. The second podcast is a brief overview of product security advances from Larry Kovnat, Xerox Product Security Manager.

I hope you have a few minutes to check them out and enter into the dialog on the blog.

David Drab
Principal, Information Content Security Services
Xerox Global Services

June 07, 2007

Unreasonable Research

After answering questions for a Xerox press release, the carousel started for talking to reporters. Actually a good thing, since it means that the press release found a good number recipients and covered an interesting technical topic.One question, however, that always bothers me. It always comes, as certain as bad weather on weekends: "How/why did you invent this technology?"

The standard answer is something like: "we stumbled on it"; or "we had an Eureka moment". Needless to say that I hate this description since it makes us idiots stumbling along and occasionally stumbling over something valuable. In reality, we are something different altogether, we are "unreasonable".

In my opinion, research has to be unreasonable, or to put it in the words of George Bernard Shaw: "Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people". Unreasonable in this context means to deviate from the path, because most of the interesting items are not lying on a path that many people intend to travel. Just imagine a mountain top as your destination, and as long as you climb the path nicely, everything is fine, but nothing new will come about.

How often have you been on a mountain trail and somewhere on the way you saw something beautiful, interesting in a direction that you did not intend to travel? What are you going to do? Be reasonable and keep climbing? Or are you going to explore? And the creative researchers among us are good, very good in exploring and quickly assessing the new item - and unreasonable enough to deviate from the path and head in the new direction. Consciously.

Let me take the current UV press release as an anchor.

Now scientists at Xerox Corporation have developed a new technology that makes it easier to add security to any document from a personal check to a birth certificate using the same printers found in most print shops.The innovative security printing method uses a special combination of toners - the "dry ink" used in xerographic printers - to create the secure imprint. Prints from a four-color printer selectively expose the fluorescent properties found within white paper, making it possible to embed personalized printing, hidden security marks or codes that are only visible when exposed to ultraviolet light.

How did we really invent it? Well, consider "best color quality possible" as our mountain top. Raja Bala had circumvented a problem which I considered easy to solve (I was wrong, of course!). But I found the beginning of a path that led into a new direction. Sadly however, I was not able to follow it, so I documented the trail head, and - importantly - also described what I expected to be an interesting topic for data encoding: Paper Fluorescence. But even with the help of some other people I was just not able to make any progress on that path.

So far so bad, but being unreasonable, it stayed in our heads. Years later (yes, years!!! , this exchange happened in 2001!!!) Raja came to me and told me that, “yes”, there was a trailhead, but “no”, my description was wrong (Raja was wrong, of course!). But Raja had successfully avoided the first obstacle on the path. Suddenly the next steps became clearer and we filed our first IDs in 2005. Since then, with the help of others inside Xerox Innovation Group and FreeFlow VIPP, we have been able to actually create a working system, moving the fluorescent encoding into product in 2006 (VIPP Freeflow Security Suite).

What was the most fun in this work? That in 2007 we discovered another interesting trail forking of the fluorescent trail, one that we are working on now and that - in my view - is even more valuable.

Let's all be a bit more unreasonable.

Reiner Eschbach
Research Fellow
Xerox Innovation Group

Site hosted by Xerox Corporation.